DOWNLOAD
SITE SEARCH
EMAIL UPDATES
Want to keep on top of what's going on in our community? It's easy! SIGN UP TODAY for the Dallas Voice's weekly Email update and have the latest news and information sent directly to you.
EMAIL ADDRESS
EMAIL ADDRESS
Lambert’s antics at the AMAs hurt us all
By Jennifer Vanasco Special Contributor
Nov 25, 2009 - 5:07:06 PM
If gay American Idol runner-up doesn’t want to ‘lead the fucking way for the civil rights movement,’ he should at least get out of it
Yes, Adam Lambert, you’re right: Hip-hop artists and women get away with salacious performances all the time without an uproar.
Of course, there was that famous Madonna-and-Britney kiss that caused a stir, but that was likely because the artists were, well, Madonna and Britney.
And yes, Adam Lambert, your performance on ABC’s American Music Awards this week was not really all that raunchy. A kiss is a kiss, and there’s nothing wrong with that.
I could have done without you sticking a guy’s head in your crotch spontaneously, but it happened so quickly and in the midst of so many other things that if the dancer didn’t mind, I’m not sure “offensive” is what I’d call it.
What I’d call it instead is misguided.
Here’s my problem:
You told Out magazine that you didn’t make a big deal out of your sexual orientation during “American Idol” once pictures of you kissing a man had been exposed because, “I don’t understand why it has to be about my sexuality. I’m just not going to talk about it one way or another. … And then when those pictures came out, I was like, you know what? I thought maybe I’ll just own it and say, ‘Yeah, I’m gay.’ But I didn’t want to label myself.”
That’s interesting, Adam Lambert.
When you were worried about winning a contest, you didn’t want to openly attest to being gay. (And, in fact, your people were worried that you would seem “too gay” on Out’s cover.)
But when you wanted to make a splash in public, when you wanted to get noticed, suddenly you were all about gay sexuality.
And so my problem is with the timing.
You see, Adam Lambert, you may say, “I’m not trying to lead the fucking way for the civil rights movement that we’re in right now.”
But the fact is that we are in a struggle for our civil rights, and you are a pop culture figure (thanks in no small part to the support of gays and gay allies.)
We are in a dangerous moment. Our political allies are quickly backing away from us, thanks to losses on gay marriage in California and Maine and the Democratic loss of the governorship in New Jersey.
Whereas just over a year ago it seemed like gay marriage was an inevitable wave sweeping the country — and a tsunami in New England, New Jersey and New York — now it feels like the tide has turned.
The hate crimes bill victory was followed by a vicious hate crime in Puerto Rico. We have hearings on ENDA, which could go either way. We have “Don’t ask, don’t tell” hearings that are being put off until 2010. We have a president who isn’t sure he is our friend.
And what is the mainstream most worried about, Adam Lambert? Why are they afraid of our partnerships, our service to our country, our working lives, our families?
They are worried because they think gay life is exactly what you portrayed on the American Music Awards: focused on the kind of sex that turns people into animals (almost literally, in this case, with crawling dancers leading you on leashes), geared toward enticing children (ABC is a network owned by Disney, for heaven’s sake), degrading, rapacious, empty.
This is why mainstream America votes against gays, Adam Lambert. Not because of people who have families and jobs and bills and weddings. Because of people like you, who use sexuality thoughtlessly in order to advance your own agenda, instead of thinking about the very real consequences your actions will have on others’ civil rights.
If you were a private citizen, this wouldn’t matter. But you are not. You are able to be openly gay thanks to people who did, in fact, make it their life’s work to “lead the fucking way for the civil rights movement.”
You dishonor them — and you hurt us — by pretending otherwise.
Jennifer Vanasco is a freelance columnist who lives in New York. She can be reached at jennifer.vanasco@gmail.com.
This article appeared in the Dallas Voice print edition November 27, 2009.
![]() |
| Adam Lambert, left, kisses a male dancer as he performs during the closing act of the 37th Annual American Music Awards on Sunday, Nov. 22, in Los Angeles. (Matt Sayles/Associated Press) |
Of course, there was that famous Madonna-and-Britney kiss that caused a stir, but that was likely because the artists were, well, Madonna and Britney.
And yes, Adam Lambert, your performance on ABC’s American Music Awards this week was not really all that raunchy. A kiss is a kiss, and there’s nothing wrong with that.
I could have done without you sticking a guy’s head in your crotch spontaneously, but it happened so quickly and in the midst of so many other things that if the dancer didn’t mind, I’m not sure “offensive” is what I’d call it.
What I’d call it instead is misguided.
Here’s my problem:
You told Out magazine that you didn’t make a big deal out of your sexual orientation during “American Idol” once pictures of you kissing a man had been exposed because, “I don’t understand why it has to be about my sexuality. I’m just not going to talk about it one way or another. … And then when those pictures came out, I was like, you know what? I thought maybe I’ll just own it and say, ‘Yeah, I’m gay.’ But I didn’t want to label myself.”
That’s interesting, Adam Lambert.
When you were worried about winning a contest, you didn’t want to openly attest to being gay. (And, in fact, your people were worried that you would seem “too gay” on Out’s cover.)
But when you wanted to make a splash in public, when you wanted to get noticed, suddenly you were all about gay sexuality.
And so my problem is with the timing.
You see, Adam Lambert, you may say, “I’m not trying to lead the fucking way for the civil rights movement that we’re in right now.”
But the fact is that we are in a struggle for our civil rights, and you are a pop culture figure (thanks in no small part to the support of gays and gay allies.)
We are in a dangerous moment. Our political allies are quickly backing away from us, thanks to losses on gay marriage in California and Maine and the Democratic loss of the governorship in New Jersey.
Whereas just over a year ago it seemed like gay marriage was an inevitable wave sweeping the country — and a tsunami in New England, New Jersey and New York — now it feels like the tide has turned.
The hate crimes bill victory was followed by a vicious hate crime in Puerto Rico. We have hearings on ENDA, which could go either way. We have “Don’t ask, don’t tell” hearings that are being put off until 2010. We have a president who isn’t sure he is our friend.
And what is the mainstream most worried about, Adam Lambert? Why are they afraid of our partnerships, our service to our country, our working lives, our families?
They are worried because they think gay life is exactly what you portrayed on the American Music Awards: focused on the kind of sex that turns people into animals (almost literally, in this case, with crawling dancers leading you on leashes), geared toward enticing children (ABC is a network owned by Disney, for heaven’s sake), degrading, rapacious, empty.
This is why mainstream America votes against gays, Adam Lambert. Not because of people who have families and jobs and bills and weddings. Because of people like you, who use sexuality thoughtlessly in order to advance your own agenda, instead of thinking about the very real consequences your actions will have on others’ civil rights.
If you were a private citizen, this wouldn’t matter. But you are not. You are able to be openly gay thanks to people who did, in fact, make it their life’s work to “lead the fucking way for the civil rights movement.”
You dishonor them — and you hurt us — by pretending otherwise.
Jennifer Vanasco is a freelance columnist who lives in New York. She can be reached at jennifer.vanasco@gmail.com.
This article appeared in the Dallas Voice print edition November 27, 2009.
© Copyright by DallasVoice.com
Top of Page
The following comments were posted by readers and were not edited by Dallas Voice. When you comment, stay on topic and treat others with respect. Posts deemed offensive will be removed.
Georgia
Nov 25, 2009 at 19:24
Nov 25, 2009 at 19:24
Each year, during the month of June, in major cities across the U.S.,
bare-chested lesbians ride motorcycles through the heart of downtown;
bare-assed tubby hirsute men don leather fetish gear; muscle boys prance in
speedos; and gay porn stars are openly celebrated. The LGBT community
refers to this spectacle as Gay Pride. Adam's Hot Topic performance pales
in comparison.
Mimi
Nov 25, 2009 at 20:00
Nov 25, 2009 at 20:00
Amen, Georgia. This guy exploded on the scene fueled by a voice, a
presence and a talent that we haven't seen since Prince. He exudes
sexuality so naturally it pervades men, women, young and old. Not even
Freddie Mercury could do that.
Let the guy have his time in the limelight - I daresay his voice will triumph over his theatrics in the future. He is having the time of his life and it shows and what more could we ask for from an entertainer.
Gay or Straight or anything in between -let's give this kid a break. He has a huge career ahead of him and plenty of time for celebrations of his talent as well as mistakes and disappoints that come with the territory.
I say, stand by your man LGBT.
Let the guy have his time in the limelight - I daresay his voice will triumph over his theatrics in the future. He is having the time of his life and it shows and what more could we ask for from an entertainer.
Gay or Straight or anything in between -let's give this kid a break. He has a huge career ahead of him and plenty of time for celebrations of his talent as well as mistakes and disappoints that come with the territory.
I say, stand by your man LGBT.
lorenzo herrera y lozano
Nov 25, 2009 at 21:16
Nov 25, 2009 at 21:16
Well there goes a few decades of work to respect and honor the various
manifestations of sex and sexuality. Again, I wasn't impressed with the
performance (it needed a lot of work and at least one more rehearsal), but
overall I think it was fine. I'm not down with making arguments about what
people do with their sex/sexuality. I don't even find it interesting that
Lambert avoided the "gay" issue during American Idol and now leads with his
gayness. That's kinda the way most queer men I know have learned to
survive. I was nowhere as "out" while getting my BA as I am now in grad
school. I was closeted during my earlier jobs and now, 10 years later,
assumed my current boss knew I was queer when she first interviewed me for
a job.
Why are folks so terrified of us embodying that which conservatives say we are? Have religious idiots insisted enough that gay marriage will lead to sex with ducks that we're now afraid we might actually get it on with a chicken? The backup dancer on the leash was probably one of the highlights of the performance (yes, assuming the backup dancer consented).
These are, indeed, troubling times as we see our rights used as collateral by elected officials. But, this isn't the first time. The rights of people of color have been used as collateral in this country since the times white people were happily received with turkeys and squash (so says the ill holiday we're about to celebrate). For queer people of color, seeing our rights tossed back and forth is a way of life (albeit an unjust way!). If you're LGBT and of color and haven't noticed this.. well, you're just not paying attention.
Lastly, I don't think it's lil' Adam's responsibility to carry anyone's struggle. I'm not even sure I can put my finger on which struggle he would carry. HRC's? NGLTF's? Or that of a queer people of color led agenda? Based on the tone of the this piece.. I'd say we're talking about HRC, which leaves me out the equation.
Why are folks so terrified of us embodying that which conservatives say we are? Have religious idiots insisted enough that gay marriage will lead to sex with ducks that we're now afraid we might actually get it on with a chicken? The backup dancer on the leash was probably one of the highlights of the performance (yes, assuming the backup dancer consented).
These are, indeed, troubling times as we see our rights used as collateral by elected officials. But, this isn't the first time. The rights of people of color have been used as collateral in this country since the times white people were happily received with turkeys and squash (so says the ill holiday we're about to celebrate). For queer people of color, seeing our rights tossed back and forth is a way of life (albeit an unjust way!). If you're LGBT and of color and haven't noticed this.. well, you're just not paying attention.
Lastly, I don't think it's lil' Adam's responsibility to carry anyone's struggle. I'm not even sure I can put my finger on which struggle he would carry. HRC's? NGLTF's? Or that of a queer people of color led agenda? Based on the tone of the this piece.. I'd say we're talking about HRC, which leaves me out the equation.
Dorena
Nov 25, 2009 at 22:21
Nov 25, 2009 at 22:21
I think Adam is helping the cause by being himself. Yes, the AMA's were a
bit much. In general he is very talented, intelligent, articulate and has
tons of charisma. He has legions of fans who are extremely loyal. He has
opened the door as an openly gay pop star. Yes, he is helping the cause -
he doesn't have to preach to the masses.
GrrrlRomeo
Nov 26, 2009 at 00:52
Nov 26, 2009 at 00:52
Hey, how's that internalized oppression working out for you?
Adam's performance was probably in response to the gay community's OUTRAGE for him not being gay enough. Now he's too gay. Why is this Jennifer Vanasco person trying to police us on how gay we should be and when?
Adam's performance was probably in response to the gay community's OUTRAGE for him not being gay enough. Now he's too gay. Why is this Jennifer Vanasco person trying to police us on how gay we should be and when?
M
Nov 26, 2009 at 07:58
Nov 26, 2009 at 07:58
I agree with everyone here. Let Adam be as gay as he wants to be. Who cares
about the religious Idiots. I'm sick of them myself. Screw ABC for
canceling his morning appearance. I'm not even a big fan of his but I'm all
for getting more "gay" air time.
Chris
Nov 27, 2009 at 11:49
Nov 27, 2009 at 11:49
Too much of the modern LGBT movement has been consumed with the
heteronormativity and politeness that characterized the pre Stonewall era.
It wasn't shuffling along in a circle, in suits and dresses (on men and
women respectively), trying to be like everyone else that broke the
barrier. It was an army of outraged trannies, drag queens and hustlers who
weren't going to take it anymore!
We are not straight. We never will be straight. Why the hell should we be bending over backwards to ape that we are?
We are not straight. We never will be straight. Why the hell should we be bending over backwards to ape that we are?
chevytexas
Nov 27, 2009 at 20:43
Nov 27, 2009 at 20:43
This disturbed me when I saw it the first time; Jennifer Venasco is
constitutionally provided her opinion. So is Adam Lambert. Adam doesn't owe
Jennifer a thing; and, vice-versa. As a 60-year old out man in business who
enjoys knowing what people think of him in actuality, it would be nice for
any gay performer to feel comfortable in their skin. However, new
performers are artists in growth; they're not validators for noisy lesbians
who after all, have their own stage models. Shame on Jennifer (or her
mother...)
Jack E. Jett
Nov 28, 2009 at 11:27
Nov 28, 2009 at 11:27
Unless Jennifer was just as upset by the Britney/Madonna kiss then it is
all a bit hypocritical.
Adam Lambert doesn't owe the gay community a thing. The Advocate and other have done nothing but bash him.
Remember Divine? Freddie? Bowie?
John/Yoko nude? Creativity breeds more creativity.
Relax. Enjoy.
Adam Lambert doesn't owe the gay community a thing. The Advocate and other have done nothing but bash him.
Remember Divine? Freddie? Bowie?
John/Yoko nude? Creativity breeds more creativity.
Relax. Enjoy.
scottty ray
Nov 28, 2009 at 21:31
Nov 28, 2009 at 21:31
My email to JV...Bashing Lambert is an easy target ,and rather sleazy.
Sorry your rock tv was on and you had to witness such a'
misguided"performance, He kissed a GIRL.,OH GOD! NOW THE GAY ICON IS
STRAIGHT...Look over there David Letterman and Sarah Palin are f*cking.That
would be worth writing about...and sleazy..
killme
Nov 29, 2009 at 04:15
Nov 29, 2009 at 04:15
i agree with what the writer has written. coming from a country where
homosexuality is still illegal and any positive mention of it in the media
even in sex education is legally banned. the only thing people here are
exposed to with regard to homosexuals are paedophiles, rapists. drug use
and in churches where we are constantly vilified. we have no way to air our
side of the story publicly without risk of jail or death whereas the public
has easy access to the american media through the internet. life is shit,
but i like lambert and i think his only obligation is towards himself,
everything else would be icing on the cake.
Tom P
Nov 29, 2009 at 12:06
Nov 29, 2009 at 12:06
Oh you have got to be kidding me. I can't even READ this story yet because
I am so angry about the title.
Are you the president of the Texas Log Cabin Republicans? Because if you aren't, you should be.
GROW UP and get a pair.
OH, and I just went and read your article, and it is the most unsubstansive piece of crap I have read on the Dallas Voice in many many years.
You need to quit being sorry for being gay; just say "no" to self-hate.
Are you the president of the Texas Log Cabin Republicans? Because if you aren't, you should be.
GROW UP and get a pair.
OH, and I just went and read your article, and it is the most unsubstansive piece of crap I have read on the Dallas Voice in many many years.
You need to quit being sorry for being gay; just say "no" to self-hate.
Jfgm
Nov 29, 2009 at 21:36
Nov 29, 2009 at 21:36
I can not believe this was published in a gay paper. Has the writer been
to "gay pride parade"? Leave Adam alone he is an entertainer not a
politician. He does not anyone anything. I am angered by this. We can't
even accept ourselves and we want others to accept us?! This is like
someone that's black getting offended by someone who is "too black"......I
hope article with opposing view is published. Adam got discriminated
against for being gay and we need to help him out not push him even further
down
Luism
Dec 01, 2009 at 23:37
Dec 01, 2009 at 23:37
Jennifer you are an idiot. What about george Michael getting caught with
drugs or having sex in restrooms or all the "acts" in gay pride parades? A
28 yo entertainer is not responsible for America treating us as second
class citizens. It's because we allow them to discriminate us...starting
with idiots like you writing crap like this.
Joey
Dec 02, 2009 at 10:03
Dec 02, 2009 at 10:03
Adam Lambert is an entertainer, and should be taken at that. I do however,
look at the bigger picture as to how his performance effects the public,
and I am satisfied in saying that because he is gay, the media will
stereotype him, and depending on where you live, will place a heavier
weight on the gay community prove itself to be civil, decent citizens
deserving of first class rights.
Quite honestly, we have to realize that those who are bold and eccentric will always capture the attention of the media. We just have to look back to Madonna who pushed sexual openness back in the '90s and the liberation of women's sexuality to see how entertainers can leave a lasting impact on the attitudes and opinions of the public.
Quite honestly, we have to realize that those who are bold and eccentric will always capture the attention of the media. We just have to look back to Madonna who pushed sexual openness back in the '90s and the liberation of women's sexuality to see how entertainers can leave a lasting impact on the attitudes and opinions of the public.











