Healthcare reform may pass, but LGBT-friendly provisions in jeopardy

Posted on 23 Dec 2009 at 1:59pm
By Lisa Keen | Keen News Service LisaKeen@aol.com

LGBT-positive provisions in House version not included in Senate bill

It’s still a little bit of a guessing game as to whether the U.S. Senate will pass a health care reform bill this month or next — or never. But if and when it does, there’s little likelihood any pro-gay provisions adopted in the House will make it into the final version Congress sends to the president.

As of Tuesday afternoon, Dec. 22, the Senate leadership had signaled yet another revised timeline for passing its bill — Christmas Eve. If the Senate has passed the bill by Dec. 24, a House-Senate conference committee is expected to begin meeting as early as next week to hammer out a final version of the bill for both houses to then give final approval.

A final bill, they said, could be on the president’s desk before Jan. 19, the date of his State of the Union address.

While both bills from both houses are aimed at making health care insurance affordable for millions more Americans, there are a number of differences between the Senate and House versions.

The House offers a government-funded insurance option — the so-called "public option." The Senate bill does not.

The House bill prohibits federal funds from being used to cover the cost of an abortion with any insurance plan; the Senate version provides a means by which people could pay for abortion coverage themselves, even if their insurance plan involves federal subsidies.

The House version, passed in early November, has at least four provisions that benefit gay people specifically:

• Eliminating the tax penalty to gay employees who provide coverage for their spouses or partners under their employers’ health insurance policies;

• Calling on the Department of Health and Human Services to address "health disparities" suffered by populations, including those based on "sexual orientation and gender identity"

•Making people with HIV and low incomes eligible for federal assistance earlier in their illness; and

• Prohibiting discrimination based on "personal characteristics" in the delivery of health care.

The Senate version includes none of these. And the battles over the public option and abortion have threatened to completely derail the overall health care legislation at numerous points.

They are expected to be contentious issues again in conference.

Jerilyn Goodman, a spokesperson for openly gay Rep. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wisc.) who sponsored two of the four pro-gay provisions in the House bill, said Baldwin is "fully committed to a thorough conference of the health care reform legislation in which she can advocate for the LGBT provisions included in the House bill."

"She is opposed to a straight vote on the Senate bill without the opportunity to add a number of House-only provisions, including those benefitting the LGBT community," said Goodman.

The Human Rights Campaign’s legislative director, Allison Hewitt, said the group is "disappointed that the Senate did not include any of the LGBT-specific provisions that we have been working to advance throughout the health reform debate."

While Herwitt said HRC would "continue to push the congressional leadership to ensure that critical protections for LGBT people are part of the final measure," she acknowledged that the conference negotiations "will undoubtedly be complex and difficult on a range of issues."

This article appeared in the Dallas Voice print edition December 25, 2009.

Comments

comments

Powered by Facebook Comments