<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gays can marry in California!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dallasvoice.com/instant-tea/2008/05/15/gays-can-marry-in-california/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dallasvoice.com/instant-tea/2008/05/15/gays-can-marry-in-california/</link>
	<description>The Official Weblog of the Dallas Voice</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jon Garinn</title>
		<link>http://www.dallasvoice.com/instant-tea/2008/05/15/gays-can-marry-in-california/#comment-754</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Garinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 20:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dallasvoice.com/instant-tea/2008/05/15/gays-can-marry-in-california/#comment-754</guid>
		<description>Tammy's right. The parties cannot appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court because no federal constitutional questions are at issue. Perhaps I should have said that the equal protection clause of the U.S. Constitution should be the basis for a U.S. Supreme Court ruling as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tammy&#8217;s right. The parties cannot appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court because no federal constitutional questions are at issue. Perhaps I should have said that the equal protection clause of the U.S. Constitution should be the basis for a U.S. Supreme Court ruling as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tammye Nash</title>
		<link>http://www.dallasvoice.com/instant-tea/2008/05/15/gays-can-marry-in-california/#comment-753</link>
		<dc:creator>Tammye Nash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 19:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dallasvoice.com/instant-tea/2008/05/15/gays-can-marry-in-california/#comment-753</guid>
		<description>MR. Garinn said: "which, hopefully upon appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, will be the basis of a positive ruling there as well."

Just to clarify: This decision cannot be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. The lawsuits were based solely on the equal protection clause of the California State Constitution, which is not necessarily the same as the U.S. Constitution, and so the state Supreme Court has the final word.
That is why this decision, as in Massachusetts, only to that one state and not the whole country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MR. Garinn said: &#8220;which, hopefully upon appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, will be the basis of a positive ruling there as well.&#8221;</p>
<p>Just to clarify: This decision cannot be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. The lawsuits were based solely on the equal protection clause of the California State Constitution, which is not necessarily the same as the U.S. Constitution, and so the state Supreme Court has the final word.<br />
That is why this decision, as in Massachusetts, only to that one state and not the whole country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Garinn</title>
		<link>http://www.dallasvoice.com/instant-tea/2008/05/15/gays-can-marry-in-california/#comment-752</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Garinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 19:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dallasvoice.com/instant-tea/2008/05/15/gays-can-marry-in-california/#comment-752</guid>
		<description>I hope everyone can appreciate the enormity of this victory. The basis of the court's ruling is the equal protection clause of the California constitution, which, hopefully upon appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, will be the basis of a positive ruling there as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope everyone can appreciate the enormity of this victory. The basis of the court&#8217;s ruling is the equal protection clause of the California constitution, which, hopefully upon appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, will be the basis of a positive ruling there as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
