<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ministers attack Parker, warning of &#8216;gay takeover&#8217; of Houston city hall</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dallasvoice.com/instant-tea/2009/11/14/8586/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dallasvoice.com/instant-tea/2009/11/14/8586/</link>
	<description>The Official Weblog of the Dallas Voice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:22:08 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Taffet</title>
		<link>http://www.dallasvoice.com/instant-tea/2009/11/14/8586/comment-page-1/#comment-17340</link>
		<dc:creator>David Taffet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dallasvoice.com/instant-tea/?p=8586#comment-17340</guid>
		<description>Bob: I&#039;d love to see the difference. They would see substantial savings because Parker&#039;s income was much higher than Hubbard&#039;s. That&#039;s exactly what the tax code was written to benefit - a breadwinner and a stay-at-home mom who may have some smaller income.

Josh: Equality? She&#039;s NOT making an issue of her sexual orientation. Parker is &#039;This is who I am. Let&#039;s move on to the issues.&#039; The &quot;pastors&quot; are making the issue. We&#039;re talking outright bigotry by these so-called holy men. You have to wonder who else they hate. I&#039;m sure they think Locke, the African American city attorney running against Parker, is merely the less horrible choice.

Phyllis: The Parker campaign released new information today about opponent Gene Locke&#039;s benefiting financially from business dealings with the city. &#039;Nuff said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob: I&#8217;d love to see the difference. They would see substantial savings because Parker&#8217;s income was much higher than Hubbard&#8217;s. That&#8217;s exactly what the tax code was written to benefit &#8211; a breadwinner and a stay-at-home mom who may have some smaller income.</p>
<p>Josh: Equality? She&#8217;s NOT making an issue of her sexual orientation. Parker is &#8216;This is who I am. Let&#8217;s move on to the issues.&#8217; The &#8220;pastors&#8221; are making the issue. We&#8217;re talking outright bigotry by these so-called holy men. You have to wonder who else they hate. I&#8217;m sure they think Locke, the African American city attorney running against Parker, is merely the less horrible choice.</p>
<p>Phyllis: The Parker campaign released new information today about opponent Gene Locke&#8217;s benefiting financially from business dealings with the city. &#8216;Nuff said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phyllis Guest</title>
		<link>http://www.dallasvoice.com/instant-tea/2009/11/14/8586/comment-page-1/#comment-17331</link>
		<dc:creator>Phyllis Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dallasvoice.com/instant-tea/?p=8586#comment-17331</guid>
		<description>A gay takeover of City Hall? 

Houston should be so lucky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A gay takeover of City Hall? </p>
<p>Houston should be so lucky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.dallasvoice.com/instant-tea/2009/11/14/8586/comment-page-1/#comment-17325</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dallasvoice.com/instant-tea/?p=8586#comment-17325</guid>
		<description>Christians do not believe in equality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christians do not believe in equality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob</title>
		<link>http://www.dallasvoice.com/instant-tea/2009/11/14/8586/comment-page-1/#comment-17321</link>
		<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 14:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dallasvoice.com/instant-tea/?p=8586#comment-17321</guid>
		<description>I figure it cost me about 2k/year because my partner and I cannot file as a married couple.  Since these returns were release publicly, could a kind CPA run them as married filing jointly and report the exact savings?

Thanks
Bob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I figure it cost me about 2k/year because my partner and I cannot file as a married couple.  Since these returns were release publicly, could a kind CPA run them as married filing jointly and report the exact savings?</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
