Via Joe My God (“Michael Medved: Lesbian Sex Is Better, Because It Hurts To Take It In The Ass”) and Truth Wins Out (“Michael Medved, Are You Speaking From Personal Experience Here?”), clear evidence that wingnut “film and culture critic” Michael Medved thinks a lot about bungholes. Of men. And how he thinks they are being used.
You have to read this to believe it:
“The politically correct attitude not only insists that heterosexual and homosexual relationships are equivalent, but also erases differences between relationships between two women and relationships between two men. If men and women are profoundly different-and both science and common sense tell us they are- then an all-female couple is even more different from an all-male couple than either homosexual bond differs from a heterosexual union.
“This distinction helps explain the oft-noted quirk in public attitudes that sees stronger opposition and denunciation, in the Old Testament and elsewhere, to a physical relationship between two males and intimacy between two females. A physical connection between a female couple, like a physical connection between man and woman, is based primarily on acts of affection. The most common sexual practice between two men involves an act of aggression —inflicting more pain than pleasure for at least one of the parties. Even decisions by Congress, equating homosexual and heterosexual relationships, or erasing distinctions between the interaction between lesbians on the one hand and gay males on the other, cannot repeal politically incorrect realities.”
I’m just thinking, do you wonder if Mr. Medved liked this film — all those scantily-clad menz (and their bungholes) — and inspired him to focus on man-bum issues?