We've already boiled down the argument against asking Judge Vaughn Walker to recuse himself from decision Prop 8 because he's gay to a single line: immutable characteristics such as sexuality do not disqualify somebody from being impartial. But what's this about Walker having a financial interest in the outcome of his trial?
Permalink | Post a comment | Add to del.icio.us
Tagged: California, john c. eastman, Marriage, prop 8, Vaughn Walker
Comments (powered by FaceBook)