The Fool Arguing Judge Vaughn Walker Should’ve Recused Himself Because He Stands to Gain From Gay Marriage

Posted on 12 Aug 2010 at 7:45am

We've already boiled down the argument against asking Judge Vaughn Walker to recuse himself from decision Prop 8 because he's gay to a single line: immutable characteristics such as sexuality do not disqualify somebody from being impartial. But what's this about Walker having a financial interest in the outcome of his trial?

CONTINUED ยป


Permalink | Post a comment | Add to del.icio.us


Tagged: , , , ,

Queerty

Comments

comments

Powered by Facebook Comments